#Just cause 3 twitter code

Gandhi could have chosen to simply delete the contentious tweet and then posted the same image with blurred faces and that would have prevented the issue from getting escalated. So, to answer my first question - The locking of Mr Gandhi's account was as per established rules and globally-accepted norms. The most common violation has been disclosing the identity of the rape victims. Over the past few years, several leaders and government officials have violated these norms and had to apologize.

Vi) Details of family background of the victim. V) If the victim is a student, name of the school or college or any other educational institution or private coaching class or classes which the victim has joined for pursuing her hobbies such as music, drawing, dance, stitching, cooking etc. Iv) Occupation of the parents or other relations of the victim and place of work of the victim and accused/their parents or any other relative in such a manner that the victim will be identified. Iii) Residential/occupational/work address of the accused and the victim and the village at which the victim and/ or accused live. Ii) Relation of the accused with the victim. I) The names of the parents or relatives of the victim.

#Just cause 3 twitter code

Past guidelines from courts have said that print and electronic media, and people using social media such as WhatsApp, Facebook, Twitter etc., while giving information/circulating information relating to offences under section 376, 376-A, 376-B, 376-C, 376-D or 376-E of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and offences under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, shall not publish/disclose following information in such a manner that the victim will be identified directly or indirectly: Is this an attack on the democratic structure of India? Was it really under pressure from the union government that Twitter took such steps? Is Twitter taking political sides? What led to the en-masse blocking of 5,000 Congress workers' Twitter accounts? What rules did Mr Gandhi violate? Was the locking of his account justified? This entire episode raises a few questions: The tweet is now withheld in India and the account access has been restored. This was followed by the locking of the accounts of 23 senior party leaders and 7 official handles along with that of over 5,000 Congress supporters (as per the party).ДЇrom what I know, as part of the appeal process via Twitter's India Grievance Channel, Mr Gandhi submitted a copy of the formal consent/authorisation letter to use the referenced image.

The tweet was first withheld and then, Mr Gandhi's account was locked. Gandhi had tweeted an image of him meeting the parents of a nine-year-old child who was allegedly raped before being killed in Delhi. Let's first understand the chronology of events and then dive into the nuances. Just under a week after it locked Rahul Gandhi's account on August 8, Twitter restored the Congress leader's handle.